Penetration testing plays a vital role in FedRAMP assessments, and red team testing represents this domain’s most advanced and realistic evaluation form. This article delves into the scope, process, and value of red team penetration testing in the FedRAMP context, providing insights for cloud service providers, third-party assessment organizations, and federal stakeholders.
Understanding Penetration Testing in FedRAMP
Penetration testing in FedRAMP is a mandatory requirement expected to occur annually or after significant system changes. Its primary purpose is to identify security weaknesses that adversaries could exploit proactively.
The test is governed by NIST SP 800-115 and the FedRAMP Penetration Test Guidance and must be conducted by a FedRAMP-accredited 3PAO. The assessment encompasses all in-scope system components and must be carried out within clearly defined authorization boundaries.
Attack vectors evaluated typically include access from external and internal sources, privilege escalation, and attempts to exploit system misconfigurations.
FedRAMP mandates that the test results be incorporated into the Security Assessment Report, which becomes part of the system’s overall security package. This ensures that federal agencies leveraging the system know any residual risk.
What Is Red Team Testing?
Red team testing is an advanced penetration testing that goes beyond vulnerability identification. Unlike a traditional pen test that transparently probes and identifies vulnerabilities, a red team test simulates a real-world adversary using a combination of technical exploits and social engineering tactics. The goal is to test the organization’s ability to detect, respond to, and recover from a real attack.
Unlike conventional penetration tests focusing on technical vulnerabilities, red team exercises assess an organization’s security apparatus, including policies, user behavior, and response mechanisms. Red teams emulate tactics from known threat actors, using tools and techniques grounded in current threat intelligence, such as the MITRE ATT&CK framework. This type of testing provides a holistic view of security resilience and operational readiness.
When and Why to Conduct Red Team Exercises
Red team exercises are not explicitly mandated in all FedRAMP authorizations, but are highly encouraged for high-impact systems or environments with elevated risk profiles.
The value of red team testing lies in its realism. It provides stakeholders with intelligence on how a determined attacker could exploit weaknesses in people, processes, and technologies. For CSPs, it presents an opportunity to test incident detection and response capabilities under controlled but highly realistic conditions. For federal agencies, it assures them that the cloud systems that house their sensitive data are resilient to real-world threats.
Planning a Red Team Engagement
A successful red team engagement begins with thorough planning. The CSP, 3PAO, and AO must collaborate to define the scope, rules of engagement, and test goals. This ROE document is a critical component and must be approved before testing begins, as it outlines the boundaries, allowable tactics, testing schedule, communication protocols, and safeguards to prevent unintentional service disruption.
Key steps in planning include:
- Define Objectives: Clarify what the test aims to evaluate (detection capabilities, incident response).
- Identify Scope: Select systems, environments, and interfaces that will be included in the test.
- Develop the Rules of Engagement: Establish acceptable techniques, boundaries, and escalation protocols.
- Assign Roles and Responsibilities: Designate contacts and stakeholders from CSP and 3PAO teams.
- Establish Communication Protocols: Define how and when stakeholders will communicate during the test.
- Schedule the Test: Choose a time window that minimizes operational disruption and allows adequate monitoring.
- Review and Approve Plans: Secure formal AO approval on all planned activities before execution.
Testing must include the mandatory attack vectors identified by FedRAMP, such as External to Corporate, External to CSP Target System, and Tenant-to-Tenant scenarios.
Executing the Red Team Test
Red teams may exploit vulnerabilities, evade detection systems, and attempt lateral movement across the environment. Social engineering tactics, like phishing, may also be used to test user awareness and training effectiveness.
Throughout the test, communication with the CSP’s security operations team is maintained at agreed-upon intervals or under predefined conditions (if a test escalates beyond control). Testing is aligned with NIST SP 800-115 methodologies and includes:
- Reconnaissance: Gathering information about the system, infrastructure, personnel, and potential entry points.
- Exploitation: Attempting to gain unauthorized access using known vulnerabilities or newly discovered weaknesses.
- Post-Exploitation: Expanding access, elevating privileges, moving laterally within the network, and identifying sensitive assets.
- Cleanup: Restore the system to its original state, remove any test artifacts, and ensure no lingering impacts remain.
A key feature of red team exercises is measuring time-to-detect and time-to-contain. These metrics help determine how quickly and effectively a CSP can identify and mitigate unauthorized activity.
Reporting and Remediation
Upon completing the red team test, the 3PAO produces a comprehensive report detailing the findings, methodologies, attack paths, and potential impact. This report must be submitted as part of the broader Security Assessment Report. The findings should be categorized by risk severity, and remediation recommendations must be provided.
The CSP addresses the findings through a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M). This document tracks the remediation status and timelines for resolving identified issues. Transparency and prompt remediation are critical for maintaining FedRAMP authorization and demonstrating a commitment to continuous improvement.
Red team results also serve as valuable input for refining incident response plans, training programs, and security configurations. To maximize the exercise’s value, organizations are encouraged to conduct internal debriefs and lessons-learned sessions following a red team engagement.
Trust Lazarus Alliance with Red Team Testing
Red team penetration testing is a vital tool in the FedRAMP security toolkit. These exercises offer unparalleled insight into a CSP’s real-world security posture by emulating sophisticated adversaries. Although not always required, red team testing is a best practice, especially for systems managing sensitive federal data or operating at the high-impact level.
Navigating the complexities of CMMC compliance demands a strategic approach to documentation and policy development. Organizations can build a robust cybersecurity framework that meets compliance requirements and enhances overall security resilience by recognizing and addressing common pitfalls such as inadequate documentation, misalignment between policies and procedures, and insufficient training.
To learn more about how Lazarus Alliance can help, contact us.
- FedRAMP
- StateRAMP
- NIST 800-53
- FARS NIST 800-171
- CMMC
- SOC 1 & SOC 2
- HIPAA, HITECH, & Meaningful Use
- PCI DSS RoC & SAQ
- IRS 1075 & 4812
- ISO 27001, ISO 27002, ISO 27005, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 22301, ISO 17020, ISO 17021, ISO 17025, ISO 17065, ISO 9001, & ISO 90003
- NIAP Common Criteria – Lazarus Alliance Laboratories
- And dozens more!
What Is Autonomous Malware?
We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI. With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→
What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone
In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→
Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools
A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→
Shutdown Security And Cyber Vulnerability
When the federal government shuts down, the public sees closed monuments, unpaid workers, and halted programs. What they do not see is the silent surge of cyberattacks targeting agencies already operating on fumes. During the most recent shutdown, attacks against U.S. government systems spiked by nearly 85%. Cybersecurity failures during government disruptions rarely start with...Continue reading→
Identity and the Shift from Malware
The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing. We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→
Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks
The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→
Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?
The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→
Centralizing Identity-Based Risk
As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector. It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→
Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide
FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility. This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→
The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches
Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks. Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→
Related Posts