February 2018 -

Mueller indictments of Russian cyber criminals put election hacking at top of mind

State officials expressed grave concerns about election hacking the day after Special Counsel Robert Mueller handed down indictments of 13 Russian nationals on charges of interfering with the 2016 presidential election. The Washington Post reports:

At a conference of state secretaries of state in Washington, several officials said the government was slow to share information about specific threats faced by states during the 2016 election. According to the Department of Homeland Security, Russian government hackers tried to gain access to voter registration files or public election sites in 21 states.

Although the hackers are not believed to have manipulated or removed data from state systems, experts worry that the attackers might be more successful this year. And state officials say reticence on the part of Homeland Security to share sensitive information about the incidents could hamper efforts to prepare for the midterms.

Mueller indictments of Russian cyber criminals put election hacking at top of mind

Granted, the Mueller indictments allege disinformation and propaganda-spreading using social media, not direct election hacking. However, taken together with the attacks on state elections systems, it is now indisputable that Russian cyber criminals used a highly sophisticated, multi-pronged approach to tamper with the 2016 election. While there have been no reported attacks on state systems since, there is no reason to believe that election hacking attempts by Russians or other foreign threat actors will simply cease; if anything, cyber criminals are likely to step up their game during the critical 2018 midterms this November.

These aren’t new issues; cybersecurity was a top issue leading up to the 2016 election. Everyone agreed then, and everyone continues to agree now, that more needs to be done to prevent election hacking. So, what’s the holdup?

One of the biggest issues in tackling election hacking is the sheer logistics of U.S. elections. The United States doesn’t have one large national “election system”; it has a patchwork of thousands of mini election systems overseen by individual states and local authorities. Some states have hundreds, even thousands of local election agencies; The Washington Post reports that Wisconsin alone has 1,800. To its credit, Wisconsin has encrypted its database and would like to implement multi-factor authentication. However, this would require election employees to have a second device, such as a cell phone, to log in – and not all of them have work-issued phones or even high-speed internet access.

Not surprisingly, funding is also a stumbling block. Even prior to the 2016 elections, cybersecurity experts were imploring states to ensure that all of their polling places were using either paper ballots with optical scanners or electronic machines capable of producing paper audit trails. However, as we head toward the midterms, five states are still using electronic machines that do not produce audit trails, and another nine have at least some precincts that still lack paper ballots or audit trails. The problem isn’t that these states don’t want to replace their antiquated systems or hire cybersecurity experts to help them; they simply don’t have the budget to do so.

Congress Must Act to Prevent Election Hacking

Several bills that would appropriate more money for states to secure their systems against election hacking are pending before Congress, including the Secure Elections Act. Congress can also release funding that was authorized by the 2002 Help America Vote Act, but never appropriated.

The integrity of our elections is the cornerstone of our nation’s democracy. Proactive cybersecurity measures can prevent election hacking, but states cannot be expected to go it alone; cyber attacks do not respect borders.

The cybersecurity experts at Lazarus Alliance have deep knowledge of the cybersecurity field, are continually monitoring the latest information security threats, and are committed to protecting organizations of all sizes from security breaches. Our full-service risk assessment services and Continuum GRC RegTech software will help protect your organization from data breaches, ransomware attacks, and other cyber threats.

Lazarus Alliance is proactive cybersecurity®. Call 1-888-896-7580 to discuss your organization’s cybersecurity needs and find out how we can help your organization adhere to cybersecurity regulations, maintain compliance, and secure your systems.

Glowing Neon malware sign on a digital projection background.

What Is Autonomous Malware?

We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI. With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→

Stay ahead of federal and industry security alerts with Lazarus Alliance. Featured

What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone

In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→

Make sure that your software is secure with or without AI. Trust Lazarus Alliance. featured

Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools

A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→

Manage identity security and compliance with a trusted partner in Lazarus Alliance. featured

Identity and the Shift from Malware

The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing. We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→

Harden security against new AI attack surfaces. Work with Lazarus Alliance. featured

Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks

The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→

Stay ahead of CMMC changes with Lazarus Alliance. Featured

Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?

The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→

Lazarus Alliance helps enterprises manage identity security and data governance.

Centralizing Identity-Based Risk

As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector. It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→

FedRAMP Authorization assessments from Lazarus Alliance. featured

Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide

FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility. This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→

Get expert monitoring and security support with Lazarus Alliance featured

The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches

Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks. Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→

Crypto-Mining Malware is Crippling Enterprise Networks

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum have gone mainstream; it seems like everybody and their brother is looking to buy some crypto and get their piece of the digital currency gold rush. Hackers want a piece of it, too. In addition to hacking ICO’s and cryptocurrency exchanges, they’re using crypto-mining malware to “mine” their own “coins.”

Crypto-mining malware isn’t new; last summer, this blog reported on a crypto-mining malware variant called Adylkuzz that came to light in the wake of the WannaCry attacks. Adylkuzz took advantage of the same Windows exploit as WannaCry. In fact, it acted as a sort of “vaccine” against the ransomware, preventing it from taking root in Adylkuzz-infected computers lest it interfere with its Monero-mining operations. However, Adylkuzz wasn’t a kinder, gentler malware. While it didn’t directly lock down systems or access data, it did hijack infected machines’ processing power, and it proved to be far more lucrative than WannaCry; it’s estimated that Adylkuzz raked in 10 times more money for its users than WannaCry.

At first, rogue crypto-miners were viewed as an annoyance; the most they did was slow down machines and perhaps cause problems accessing certain network folders. They were also seen as more of a threat to consumers than businesses. Many variants went after IoT devices, such as smartphones, overwhelming their processors to the point where the devices could be damaged or even destroyed. However, as crypto-mining malware has evolved, it has become more sophisticated, and hackers are looking to harvest enterprise processing power.

Move Over, WannaCry; Here Comes WannaMine

Recently, Dark Reading reported on yet another exploit of the Eternal Blue tool stolen from the NSA, a crypto-mining malware variant dubbed WannaMine. WannaMine doesn’t attack smartphones and other small IoT devices; it goes after Windows computers, and isn’t just slowing systems down. Security firm CrowdStrike reports having seen it cause “applications and hardware to crash, causing operational disruptions lasting days and sometimes even weeks.”

A report in Security Week elaborates on how WannaMine appears to be designed to specifically target enterprise networks:

WannaMine, the security researchers explain, employs “living off the land” techniques for persistence, such as Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) permanent event subscriptions. The malware has a fileless nature, leveraging PowerShell for infection, which makes it difficult to block without the appropriate security tools.

The malware uses credential harvester Mimikatz to acquire legitimate credentials that would allow it to propagate and move laterally. If that fails, however, the worm attempts to exploit the remote system via EternalBlue.

To achieve persistence, WannaMine sets a permanent event subscription that would execute a PowerShell command located in the Event Consumer every 90 minutes.

The malware targets all Windows versions starting with Windows 2000, including 64-bit versions and Windows Server 2003. However, it uses different files and commands for Windows Vista and newer platform iterations.

WannaMine isn’t the only crypto-mining malware harnessing Eternal Blue and using the Windows Management Infrastructure to propagate. Another Monero-mining worm, dubbed Smominru (aka Ismo), has infected over a half a million Windows hosts, most of them servers.

These “next-generation” crypto-mining malware variants have proven extremely difficult to take down. First, the malware is distributed. Second, even if all machines on a network are patched against Eternal Blue, the malware will seek to use the Mimikatz credential harvester to get in by cracking a weak password. Finally, some legacy antivirus products do not detect crypto-mining malware because it doesn’t actually write files to an infected machine’s disk.

Protecting Your Organization Against WannaMine and Other Crypto-Mining Malware

There are several ways to protect your enterprise systems from being hijacked for illegal crypto-mining:

Keep your systems and software up-to-date; only older Windows machines are susceptible to the Eternal Blue exploit.
Use network security software to monitor for and block the activity needed for crypto-miners to work.
Ensure that all system users are using strong passwords that cannot be cracked by Mimikatz.

In addition to doing damage to enterprise systems, crypto-mining malware can be employed by real-world threat actors to fund their criminal activity. It’s in everyone’s best interest to put a stop to it.

States Worry About Election Hacking as Midterms Approach

Mueller indictments of Russian cyber criminals put election hacking at top of mind