In an era of escalating cyber threats and regulatory scrutiny, organizations are under pressure to deliver secure software while adhering to compliance frameworks like SOC 2. DevSecOps, which integrates security into DevOps practices, offers a pathway to align agility with accountability.
However, bridging the gap between SOC 2’s rigorous controls and the rapid pace of CI/CD pipelines requires a strategic approach. This article explores how to embed SOC 2 compliance into every software development lifecycle (SDLC) phase, ensuring security and compliance are foundational rather than afterthoughts.
The Intersection of SOC 2 and DevSecOps
SOC 2 mandates adherence to five Trust Service Criteria (TSC): Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. Fortunately, these criteria map directly to DevSecOps principles, emphasizing continuous security testing, automation, and collaboration.
DevSecOps extends CI/CD pipelines to include security and compliance checks, enabling teams to:
- Detect misconfigurations early.
- Enforce policies as code.
- Generate audit-ready evidence.
By integrating SOC 2 requirements into CI/CD, organizations can automate compliance validation, reduce audit overhead, and maintain customer trust.
Best Practices for Integrating SOC 2 into CI/CD Pipelines
Integrating SOC 2 compliance into CI/CD pipelines ensures continuous adherence to security, availability, and privacy controls. Below are best practices organized into key categories, along with implementation strategies
- Automate Security and Compliance Checks: Organizations should integrate automated security tools such as SAST, DAST, dependency scanners, and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) scanners directly into CI/CD pipeline stages. These tools should automatically fail builds if critical vulnerabilities or misconfigurations are detected. Policy-as-code frameworks like Open Policy Agent (OPA) can further enforce compliance rules programmatically.
- Enforce Strict Access Controls: Access to CI/CD pipelines should be restricted using role-based access control (RBAC), such as GitHub Teams or GitLab Roles. Platform audit logs should track user activity, and authentication should require multi-factor authentication (MFA) or single sign-on (SSO) via providers like Okta or Azure AD.
- Streamline Change Management: All code and infrastructure changes should be managed through version control systems like Git, with traceable commit histories. Production deployments should require approval gates, such as pull requests (PRs) with mandatory peer reviews or deployment-stage approvals in tools like Azure DevOps.
- Maintain Audit Trails and Logging: CI/CD logs from tools like Jenkins or CircleCI should be aggregated into centralized SIEM systems for real-time analysis. To meet SOC 2 retention requirements, it must be stored immutably in secure environments, such as AWS S3 with object lock.
- Monitor and Alert: Configure real-time alerts via tools like Prometheus or Grafana to notify teams of compliance failures via Slack or email. Security monitoring tools like Wiz or Falco should detect and flag anomalies in pipeline activity.
- Secure Secrets Management: Sensitive credentials like API keys or database passwords should be stored in dedicated secret managers instead of hardcoding them in scripts. Automated rotation policies should ensure secrets are refreshed periodically.
- Ensure Infrastructure Compliance: Infrastructure-as-code (IaC) templates should be scanned pre-deployment using tools like Checkov or cfn_nag. Cloud environments should align with SOC 2 controls through services like AWS Config or Azure Policy.
- Train Teams on SOC 2 Requirements: Developers and operations teams should attend regular workshops on SOC 2 principles and how they apply to CI/CD workflows. Documentation, such as runbooks, should outline compliance steps for everyday pipeline tasks.
- Segregation of Duties (SoD): Separate roles for code development, review, and deployment should be enforced. For example, GitHub CODEOWNERS can mandate approvals from designated reviewers before merging code.
- Documentation and Audits: For transparency, compliance policies should be codified using tools like Open Policy Agent (OPA). Internal mock audits using platforms like Vanta or Drata can identify gaps before formal SOC 2 assessments.
- Incident Response Integration: Automated playbooks in tools like PagerDuty or Jira Service Management should trigger responses to pipeline breaches. Post-incident reviews must document root causes and refine controls.
- Backup and Disaster Recovery: CI/CD configurations should be backed up in version control, and disaster recovery processes like Azure Site Recovery should be tested regularly.
- Third-Party Risk Management: Verify that third-party CI/CD providers (GitHub, GitLab) are SOC 2-certified. Conducted vendor risk assessments to ensure their controls aligned with organizational requirements.
- Continuous Improvement: Security and compliance controls are iteratively updated based on audit findings, incident trends, or emerging threats. Feedback loops ensure alignment with evolving SOC 2 criteria.
Challenges and Solutions of Integrating SOC 2 in DevSecOps
Like anything worth doing, integrating SOC 2 throughout a CI/CD pipeline can prove challenging:
- Complex Control Mapping: SOC 2 requirements (access controls, incident response) can be ambiguous in automated pipelines. To address this, map controls directly to DevSecOps practices using frameworks like NIST or CSA CCM. Tools like Drata or Vanta automate control-to-process alignment and generate audit-ready reports.
- Toolchain Fragmentation: Disconnected scanning, logging, and monitoring tools create visibility gaps. Integrate tools into a unified pipeline—for example, combine SAST/DAST scanners, IaC scanners, and secrets managers into CI/CD stages. Orchestration platforms like Jenkins or GitLab CI can be used to centralize workflows.
- Audit Trail Maintenance: SOC 2 requires immutable, tamper-proof logs for auditing, but dynamic CI/CD systems often lack traceability. Implement centralized logging and enforce log immutability. Tag pipeline activities (commits, deployments) with unique IDs for traceability.
- Scalability of Compliance Controls: Manual compliance checks fail to scale with rapid DevOps cycles. Automate policy enforcement using policy-as-code tools. For example, codify rules to block deployments if IaC templates lack encryption settings.
- Evolving SOC 2 Requirements: Changing Trust Services Criteria (new privacy rules) can outpace pipeline updates. Build feedback loops with continuous monitoring tools and conduct quarterly control reviews with stakeholders to adopt policies.
- Third-Party Tool Risks: Unvetted CI/CD plugins or SaaS tools may violate SOC 2. Require vendors to provide SOC 2 Type II reports and audit their security posture via questionnaires or SIG Lite assessments. Use only approved, pre-scanned tools in pipelines.
- Documentation Overhead: Manual evidence collection for audits slows DevOps teams. Automate documentation using compliance-as-code tools to generate real-time reports and store artifacts in version-controlled repositories like Git for easy access during audits.
- Access Control Sprawl: Overprivileged pipeline service accounts or stale credentials risk unauthorized access. Enforce least-privilege access via RBAC and automate permission reviews. Require MFA for all pipeline interactions.
- Balancing Speed and Compliance: Teams may bypass controls to meet deadlines, undermining SOC 2 adherence. Shift security left by embedding checks early and optimizing scans to run in parallel, reducing pipeline latency.
Get Rapid, Complete SOC 2 Attestation with Lazarus Alliance
Integrating SOC 2 into DevSecOps isn’t just about avoiding fines—it’s about building resilient systems that customers trust. By automating compliance checks, fostering collaboration, and leveraging tools like CaC and IaC, organizations can turn CI/CD pipelines into engines of continuous compliance.
To learn more about how Lazarus Alliance can help, contact us.
- FedRAMP
- StateRAMP
- NIST 800-53
- FARS NIST 800-171
- CMMC
- SOC 1 & SOC 2
- HIPAA, HITECH, & Meaningful Use
- PCI DSS RoC & SAQ
- IRS 1075 & 4812
- ISO 27001, ISO 27002, ISO 27005, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 22301, ISO 17020, ISO 17021, ISO 17025, ISO 17065, ISO 9001, & ISO 90003
- NIAP Common Criteria – Lazarus Alliance Laboratories
- And dozens more!
What Is Autonomous Malware?
We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI. With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→
What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone
In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→
Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools
A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→
Shutdown Security And Cyber Vulnerability
When the federal government shuts down, the public sees closed monuments, unpaid workers, and halted programs. What they do not see is the silent surge of cyberattacks targeting agencies already operating on fumes. During the most recent shutdown, attacks against U.S. government systems spiked by nearly 85%. Cybersecurity failures during government disruptions rarely start with...Continue reading→
Identity and the Shift from Malware
The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing. We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→
Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks
The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→
Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?
The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→
Centralizing Identity-Based Risk
As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector. It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→
Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide
FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility. This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→
The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches
Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks. Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→
Related Posts