The WannaCry ransomware attack was the end result of years of ignorance on the part of governments, private-sector firms, and the public regarding how serious cyber threats have become.
The 2016 Shadow Brokers NSA hack came home to roost in a big way last week, when a code execution vulnerability contained in the Shadow Brokers WikiLeaks dump was used to launch the largest ransomware attack in history. The WannaCry ransomware strain, also known as WannaCrypt, Wana Decryptor, and WCry, hit hundreds of thousands of computers in 150 countries before it was halted – temporarily – when a security analyst stumbled upon a “kill switch” in the code. However, even the analyst who discovered the kill switch emphasized that the fix was, indeed, temporary; reports of new variants are emerging, and the kill switch does nothing to help the armies of machines that have already been infected.
WannaCry wreaked havoc on companies in numerous industry sectors, including French car manufacturer Renault and Spanish telecommunications giant Telefonica, but perhaps the most stark illustration of the damage was what it did to Britain’s National Health Service (NHS). The Guardian reports that 45 NHS facilities were infected, forcing hospitals to redirect ambulances, postpone treatments for cancer patients, and warn patients of delays overall.
Organizations in the U.S. were fortunate; a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told NPR that the number of WannaCry ransomware victims stateside was “very small.” But that’s only because of luck – and luck eventually runs out.
WannaCry Ransomware Took Advantage of Old, Unsupported Systems
The WannaCry ransomware nearly exclusively impacted enterprise machines, not home computers, because the latter are more likely to be running updated operating systems, and WannaCry exploits a vulnerability in Windows XP up through Windows Server 2012. Microsoft released a patch for the newer end of that range in March, but the company stopped supporting some of the older systems in the group, including Windows XP and Windows 2000, years ago. After the WannaCry attack, Microsoft took the highly unusual step of issuing an “emergency patch” for Windows XP, Windows 8, and Windows Server 2003.
As soon as WannaCry hit, the buck-passing commenced. The British media attacked the government for not sufficiently funding the NHS. Microsoft criticized the NSA for not properly securing its cyber-weaponry. Meanwhile, Microsoft itself came under fire for not issuing security updates for legacy systems that it knew were still in wide use. Security experts reiterated the age-old warnings to organizations about keeping their systems updated and engaging in proactive measures to prevent attacks like WannaCry.
Do We Have Your Attention Now?
The WannaCry ransomware attack shouldn’t have surprised anyone. Cyber security experts have been warning about large-scale attacks on critical infrastructure for years, and there have been numerous smaller-scale ransomware attacks on U.S. emergency services. The only surprising things are that it took so long for something like this to happen, and that the United States was not hit as hard as the rest of the world, particularly since preliminary evidence indicates that WannaCry may be the work of the same North Korean hackers who were behind the Sony Pictures email hack and last summer’s SWIFT network attack on a bank in Bangladesh.
American healthcare facilities are plagued with the same cybersecurity problems as the NHS, including antiquated legacy systems and an unwillingness on the part of organizations to invest in proactive cybersecurity measures. Other industries aren’t doing that much better, including the government. After all, the exploit that started all of this was stolen from an American spy agency. If the NSA cannot properly secure its systems, what does that say about everyone else?
The WannaCry attacks are the natural end result of the government, private-sector organizations, and the public engaging in reactive cybersecurity at best, and remaining ignorant of cybersecurity at worst. Mere days before WannaCry hit, the Trump Administration issued an executive order commanding the federal government to get its cybersecurity house in order. Private-sector organizations and, yes, individuals need to do the same. Everyone needs to be aware of the seriousness of engaging in proactive cybersecurity best practices and the severe potential consequences of not doing so.
Thanks to WannaCry, everyone now knows what ransomware is and what it’s capable of doing. The question is, what are we going to do with this information?
The cybersecurity experts at Lazarus Alliance have deep knowledge of the cybersecurity field, are continually monitoring the latest information security threats, and are committed to protecting organizations of all sizes from security breaches. Our full-service risk assessment services and Continuum GRC RegTech software will help protect your organization from data breaches, ransomware attacks, and other cyber threats.
Lazarus Alliance is proactive cybersecurity®. Call 1-888-896-7580 to discuss your organization’s cybersecurity needs and find out how we can help your organization adhere to cybersecurity regulations, maintain compliance, and secure your systems.
What Is Autonomous Malware?
We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI. With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→
What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone
In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→
Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools
A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→
Shutdown Security And Cyber Vulnerability
When the federal government shuts down, the public sees closed monuments, unpaid workers, and halted programs. What they do not see is the silent surge of cyberattacks targeting agencies already operating on fumes. During the most recent shutdown, attacks against U.S. government systems spiked by nearly 85%. Cybersecurity failures during government disruptions rarely start with...Continue reading→
Identity and the Shift from Malware
The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing. We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→
Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks
The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→
Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?
The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→
Centralizing Identity-Based Risk
As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector. It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→
Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide
FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility. This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→
The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches
Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks. Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→
