Documentation and Automation in CMMC

CMMC requires extensive controls, policies, and compliance documentation like any other framework. Unfortunately, this documentation takes weeks or even months to complete correctly, and human error is always possible. 

Here, we discuss documentation requirements under CMMC and how automation can help make the certification process more manageable. 

Understanding the Significance of Documentation in CMMC Compliance

In the realm of CMMC, the saying”if it’s not documented, it doesn’t exist” holds a lot of truth. Documentation is the backbone of compliance, providing a structured and verifiable record of an organization’s cybersecurity posture. It encompasses policies, procedures, plans, and records demonstrating the implementation and maintenance of required security controls.

1. System Security Plan (SSP): The SSP offers a detailed overview of the organization’s information system, delineating boundaries, environments, and the specific security requirements in place. It is a foundational document outlining how each CMMC practice is addressed within the system.
2. Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M): This document identifies areas where security controls are deficient or absent, providing a roadmap for remediation. It details the tasks required to address each gap, assigns responsibilities, and sets timelines for completion.
3. Policies and Procedures: High-level policies articulate the organization’s commitment to cybersecurity across various domains, such as access control, incident response, and configuration management. Corresponding procedures offer step-by-step guidance on executing these policies effectively.
4. Incident Response Plan (IRP): The IRP outlines the processes for detecting, responding to, and recovering from cybersecurity incidents. It ensures that incidents are managed systematically to minimize impact and swiftly restore normal operations.
5. Training Records: Documentation of security awareness and role-specific training sessions, including attendance logs and training materials, evidences the organization’s efforts to cultivate a security-conscious culture.
6. Maintenance Logs: Records of system maintenance activities, such as updates, patches, and hardware repairs, demonstrate ongoing efforts to maintain system integrity and security.

The Role of Evidence Collection in CMMC Assessments

While documentation lays the groundwork, evidence collection proves that security controls are implemented and practical. Assessors rely on this evidence to verify compliance and the operational status of security practices.

Some types of evidence for CMMC certification include:

1. Direct Evidence: This category contains artifacts such as system configurations, access control lists, and audit logs that directly demonstrate the implementation of security controls.
2. Indirect Evidence: Supporting materials like meeting minutes, policy acknowledgment forms, and training certificates that corroborate the existence and enforcement of security practices.
3. Observational Evidence: Findings from walkthroughs, demonstrations, or interviews provide insight into the practical application of security controls within the organization.

Best Practices for Managing CMMC Documentation

CMMC has several requirements for managing documents, most of which can be handled through clear, well-documented best practices. These practices include:

1. Establish a Centralized Repository: All documentation and evidence should be maintained in a centralized, secure location. This will facilitate easy access during assessments and ensure consistency in documentation practices.
2. Implement Version Control: Utilize version control mechanisms to track document changes over time. This practice ensures that the most current information is available and maintains a history of revisions for reference.
3. Automate Where Possible: Leverage tools to automate the collection and storage of evidence, such as system logs and access records. Automation reduces the risk of human error and ensures that evidence is collected consistently.
4. Regularly Review and Update Documentation: Schedule periodic documentation reviews to ensure accuracy and relevance. Regular updates reflect changes in the system environment, emerging threats, and evolving regulatory requirements.
5. Assign Clear Ownership: Designate specific individuals or teams responsible for maintaining each document and evidence type. Clear ownership fosters accountability and ensures that tasks are managed effectively.
6. Conduct Internal Audits: Conduct self-assessments to identify documentation and evidence collection gaps. Internal audits prepare the organization for formal assessments and promote continuous improvement.

The Imperative of a Proactive Approach

Proactivity in documentation and evidence collection is paramount. Waiting until an assessment is imminent can lead to rushed, incomplete, or inaccurate documentation, increasing the risk of non-compliance. A proactive stance involves integrating documentation practices into daily operations, ensuring compliance becomes an ongoing effort rather than a periodic scramble.

Automation and Documentation

Automation is pivotal in managing documentation for CMMC compliance. By integrating automated solutions, organizations can enhance their documentation processes’ efficiency, accuracy, and security, ensuring a robust and continuous compliance posture.

• Streamlining Documentation Processes: Manual documentation is often labor-intensive and prone to errors. Automation simplifies this by systematically organizing and managing documents, reducing the administrative burden. Automated systems can generate, update, and maintain necessary documentation, ensuring consistency and accessibility. 
• Enhancing Accuracy and Reducing Errors: Human errors in documentation can lead to compliance gaps and potential audit failures. Automation mitigates this risk by enforcing standardized templates and procedures, ensuring all documentation aligns with CMMC requirements. 
• Real-Time Monitoring and Continuous Compliance: CMMC compliance is not a one-time effort but requires ongoing adherence to evolving standards. Automated systems provide real-time compliance status monitoring, alerting organizations to potential issues before they escalate. This proactive approach enables timely interventions and adjustments, ensuring continuous alignment with CMMC requirements. 
• Efficient Evidence Collection and Reporting: Gathering evidence for compliance audits can be daunting when done manually. Automation facilitates the seamless collection and organization of evidence, such as system logs, access records, and policy acknowledgments.

Automate CMMC Documentation with Lazarus Alliance and Continuum GRC

Mastering documentation and evidence collection is essential for achieving and maintaining CMMC compliance. These practices demonstrate adherence to required standards and fortify the organization’s cybersecurity posture. By implementing structured, consistent, and proactive documentation and evidence-collection processes, organizations can navigate the complexities of CMMC assessments with confidence and resilience.

To learn more about how Lazarus Alliance can help, contact us. 

• FedRAMP
• StateRAMP
• NIST 800-53
• FARS NIST 800-171
• CMMC
• SOC 1 & SOC 2
• HIPAA, HITECH, & Meaningful Use
• PCI DSS RoC & SAQ
• IRS 1075 & 4812
• ISO 27001, ISO 27002, ISO 27005, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 22301, ISO 17020, ISO 17021, ISO 17025, ISO 17065, ISO 9001, & ISO 90003
• NIAP Common Criteria – Lazarus Alliance Laboratories
• And dozens more!

What Is Autonomous Malware?

We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI.  With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→

What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone

In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→

Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools

A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→

Shutdown Security And Cyber Vulnerability

When the federal government shuts down, the public sees closed monuments, unpaid workers, and halted programs. What they do not see is the silent surge of cyberattacks targeting agencies already operating on fumes. During the most recent shutdown, attacks against U.S. government systems spiked by nearly 85%.  Cybersecurity failures during government disruptions rarely start with...Continue reading→

Identity and the Shift from Malware

The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing.  We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→

Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks

The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→

Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?

The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→

Centralizing Identity-Based Risk

As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector.  It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→

Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide

FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility.  This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→

The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches

Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks.  Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→