The Secure Software Development Framework, outlined in NIST Special Publication 800-218, provides guidelines and best practices to enhance the security and integrity of software development processes. NIST developed it to help organizations implement secure software development practices and mitigate risks associated with software vulnerabilities.
Key Components of the SSDF
The framework is divided into four primary categories, each focusing on a different aspect of secure software development. Here is a breakdown of the critical components:
Prepare the Organization (PO)
This category focuses on establishing a solid foundation for secure software development by setting up governance structures, defining processes, and fostering a culture of security awareness.
PO.1: Establish Governance Frameworks
- Develop policies and procedures to support secure software development.
- Ensure leadership commitment to security practices.
PO.2: Secure Software Development Lifecycle
- Define and implement a lifecycle that integrates security at every phase.
- Ensure the lifecycle is well-documented and understood by all stakeholders.
PO.3: Risk Management
- Identify and prioritize software development projects based on security risk assessments.
- Allocate resources effectively to manage identified risks.
PO.4: Security Awareness and Training
- Promote a culture of security awareness among developers and other stakeholders.
- Provide ongoing training on secure coding practices and threat awareness.
Protect the Software (PS)
This category focuses on implementing practices and controls to ensure software is developed securely, minimize vulnerabilities, and protect it from threats.
PS.1: Secure Design Principles
- Incorporate security requirements and design principles from the outset.
- Conduct threat modeling and risk assessments during the design phase.
PS.2: Secure Coding Practices
- Follow secure coding standards to prevent common vulnerabilities.
- Use tools to enforce secure coding practices and detect issues early.
PS.3: Security Testing
- Perform static and dynamic analysis to identify vulnerabilities.
- Automated testing tools are used to assess code security continuously.
PS.4: Configuration Management
- Implement secure configuration management practices.
- Ensure that software configurations are secure and maintain integrity throughout the development lifecycle.
Produce Well-Secured Software (PW)
PW.1: Integrate Security into the Software Development Process
- Ensuring security is a fundamental part of software development, not an afterthought.
- Automated tools are used to integrate security checks into the development pipeline.
PW.2: Security Reviews and Audits
- Conduct regular security reviews and audits of code and development processes.
- Address findings promptly to mitigate security risks.
PW.3: Vulnerability Management
- Establish processes for identifying, reporting, and addressing vulnerabilities.
- Use vulnerability scanning tools to detect and remediate issues.
PW.4: Documentation and Transparency
- Maintain comprehensive documentation of security practices, configurations, and vulnerabilities.
- Ensure transparency and effectiveness of the security measures implemented.
Respond to Vulnerabilities (RV)
RV.1: Vulnerability Reporting and Response
- Implement a process for reporting and responding to vulnerabilities.
- Ensure timely and effective responses to security incidents.
RV.2: Continuous Monitoring
- Monitor for new vulnerabilities and security threats continuously.
- Use tools and techniques to detect and respond to threats in real time.
RV.3: Incident Documentation
- Document incidents and responses thoroughly to learn from each event.
- Use incident documentation to improve future security practices.
RV.4: Patch Management
- Develop and implement a robust patch management process.
- Ensure that patches are applied promptly to address known vulnerabilities.
Why Is It Important to Follow SSDF?
The SSDF is a foundational approach to secure software development, a critical part of supply chain cybersecurity. Any software used by federal or defense agencies must meet the stringent security requirements outlined here and in other NIST documents (including those related to cryptography, authentication, etc.).
Generally speaking, this framework promotes:
- Enhancing Security Posture: The framework encourages integrating security practices throughout the software development lifecycle, making security an inherent part of the process rather than an afterthought. Also, by incorporating security practices from the beginning, the SSDF helps identify and mitigate vulnerabilities early in the development process, reducing the risk of security breaches in the final product.
- Reducing Risk: Implementing the SSDF helps organizations assess and mitigate risks associated with software vulnerabilities. This proactive approach minimizes the potential impact of security incidents and reduces the likelihood of costly security breaches. The framework promotes the development of resilient software that can withstand attacks and recover quickly from security incidents.
- Promoting Best Practices: The SSDF is based on industry-recognized best practices for secure software development. Adhering to these practices ensures organizations follow proven methods to enhance software security. The framework encourages a culture of continuous improvement and vigilance, promoting ongoing enhancements to security practices and processes.
- Improving Compliance: Many industries are subject to regulatory requirements and standards related to software security. Implementing the SSDF helps organizations meet these requirements, avoiding potential legal and financial penalties. The SSDF aligns with various security standards and frameworks, such as ISO/IEC 27001, CMMC, and others, helping organizations streamline their compliance efforts.
- Supporting Organizational Goals: The framework provides a structured approach to establishing governance frameworks and policies for secure software development, ensuring that security is a top priority at all levels of the organization. The SSDF helps organizations build a workforce that is aware of and committed to security best practices by promoting a security-focused culture among software developers and other stakeholders.
- Facilitating DevSecOps: The SSDF supports the integration of security into DevOps practices, fostering collaboration between development, operations, and security teams. This approach ensures that security is embedded throughout the development and deployment processes. The framework encourages using automated tools for security testing, vulnerability scanning, and continuous monitoring, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of security practices.
- Enhancing Software Quality: By incorporating security into the software design process, the SSDF helps ensure that security considerations are addressed from the outset, resulting in higher-quality, more secure software products. Addressing security issues early in development reduces technical debt, lowering the long-term maintenance costs and effort required to fix vulnerabilities.
NIST 800-218 does not mandate that an organization undergo formal assessments. However, assessments are recommended for organizations to improve their software security posture.
What Does it Mean to Implement SSDF?
Implementing the SSDF is crucial, but ensuring its effectiveness requires an effective orientation toward securing software at all stages of its development and delivery.
Security Audits
Security audits are systematic evaluations of a company’s information system security. By assessing the effectiveness of security controls and practices, these audits help organizations ensure that their security measures are robust and compliant with relevant standards.
Regular audits are essential to maintaining a high level of security. These can be scheduled annually or bi-annually, but organizations should also conduct unscheduled audits to catch any unexpected vulnerabilities. Continuous compliance with evolving standards and regulations is critical, and regular audits help achieve this goal.
Code Reviews
Code reviews are an integral part of the SSDF, focusing on improving the security and quality of the codebase. This peer-review process involves examining the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and ensure adherence to secure coding standards.
The main goal of code reviews is to find and fix security vulnerabilities in the code before it is deployed. This proactive approach helps maintain a secure codebase and reduces the risk of security breaches.
Penetration Testing
Penetration testing, or ethical hacking, involves simulating attacks on a system to find and fix security weaknesses. This testing provides a realistic security posture assessment by mimicking malicious attackers’ techniques.
The primary objective of penetration testing is to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited in real-world attacks. Organizations can strengthen their defenses and prevent potential breaches by finding these weaknesses.
Continuous Monitoring
Continuous monitoring involves observing the system’s security posture using automated tools and processes. This proactive approach helps detect and respond to security incidents in real-time.
Various tools can be used for continuous monitoring, including intrusion detection systems (IDS), security information and event management (SIEM) systems, and vulnerability scanners. These tools provide real-time alerts and reports on the system’s security status.
Developing incident response plans is crucial for quickly addressing identified issues. These plans should include containment, eradication, and recovery procedures, ensuring minimal impact on the organization’s operations.
Get Your Software Development Aligned with SSDF. Work With Lazarus Alliance
If you work in the federal space as a software developer, you’ll need to meet SSDF requirements to align with new standards (such as the Executive Order on Cybersecurity). Trust Lazarus Alliance to align your development cycle with these standards.
To learn more, contact us.
- FedRAMP
- StateRAMP
- NIST 800-53
- FARS NIST 800-171
- CMMC
- SOC 1 & SOC 2
- HIPAA, HITECH, & Meaningful Use
- PCI DSS RoC & SAQ
- IRS 1075 & 4812
- ISO 27001, ISO 27002, ISO 27005, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 22301, ISO 17020, ISO 17021, ISO 17025, ISO 17065, ISO 9001, & ISO 90003
- NIAP Common Criteria – Lazarus Alliance Laboratories
- And dozens more!
What Is Autonomous Malware?
We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI. With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→
What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone
In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→
Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools
A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→
Shutdown Security And Cyber Vulnerability
When the federal government shuts down, the public sees closed monuments, unpaid workers, and halted programs. What they do not see is the silent surge of cyberattacks targeting agencies already operating on fumes. During the most recent shutdown, attacks against U.S. government systems spiked by nearly 85%. Cybersecurity failures during government disruptions rarely start with...Continue reading→
Identity and the Shift from Malware
The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing. We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→
Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks
The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→
Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?
The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→
Centralizing Identity-Based Risk
As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector. It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→
Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide
FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility. This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→
The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches
Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks. Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→
Related Posts