Penetration tests and vulnerability scans are related but different cybersecurity services
The difference between penetration tests and vulnerability scans is a common source of confusion. While both are important tools for cyber risk analysis and are mandated under PCI DSS, HIPAA, and other security standards and frameworks, they are quite different. Let’s examine the similarities and differences between vulnerability scans and penetration tests.
What Is a Penetration Test?
A penetration test, also known as a pen test or a white-hat attack, seeks to simulate the actions of a criminal hacker attempting to break into a network, computer system, or web application, using a targeted approach to see if its security features can be defeated. While penetration tests can be automated to some extent, there is always human involvement somewhere in the process; to meet PCI DSS standards, penetration testing cannot be fully automated, although automated tools and the results of a vulnerability scan can be utilized.
A diligent pen tester does not give up easily. If a pen test is foiled by one defense, the tester adapts and tries another attack vector, just like a cyber criminal would; this is why a human with cybersecurity expertise must be involved. Depending on its scope, penetration testing may also involve simulated real-world attacks such as social engineering schemes or attempts to breach physical defenses and access hardware.
While penetration testing can theoretically be performed on the entire enterprise infrastructure and all applications, due to the time and expertise involved, this is impractical. Generally, pen testing focuses on the network or application level or on a certain department, function, or asset.
What Is a Vulnerability Scan?
Unlike penetration tests, which attempt to break through vulnerabilities, vulnerability scans seek to identify, rank, and report on security vulnerabilities, not break through them. Vulnerability scans are also far broader in scope than pen tests, covering the entire enterprise. They are also fully automated, though a cybersecurity professional must examine the issues identified by the scan and determine how to mitigate them. A scan report will typically prioritize discovered vulnerabilities according to urgency, severity, and ease of fix, as well as offer suggestions on how to make fixes.
Vulnerability scans are performed more often than penetration tests, and because they are automated, they can be scheduled to run automatically. The PCI DSS, for example, requires that organizations perform vulnerability scans at least quarterly, while penetration tests are required at least annually. Both tests should be performed anytime significant changes have been made to the data environment.
The cybersecurity experts at Lazarus Alliance have deep knowledge of the cybersecurity field, are continually monitoring the latest information security threats, and are committed to protecting organizations of all sizes from security breaches. Our full-service risk assessment services and Continuum GRC RegTech software will help protect your organization from data breaches, ransomware attacks, and other cyber threats.
Lazarus Alliance is proactive cybersecurity®. Call 1-888-896-7580 to discuss your organization’s cybersecurity needs and find out how we can help your organization adhere to cybersecurity regulations, maintain compliance, and secure your systems.
What Is Autonomous Malware?
We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI. With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→
What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone
In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→
Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools
A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→
Shutdown Security And Cyber Vulnerability
When the federal government shuts down, the public sees closed monuments, unpaid workers, and halted programs. What they do not see is the silent surge of cyberattacks targeting agencies already operating on fumes. During the most recent shutdown, attacks against U.S. government systems spiked by nearly 85%. Cybersecurity failures during government disruptions rarely start with...Continue reading→
Identity and the Shift from Malware
The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing. We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→
Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks
The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→
Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?
The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→
Centralizing Identity-Based Risk
As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector. It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→
Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide
FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility. This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→
The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches
Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks. Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→
Related Posts