Digital payments are, for the most part, the norm for commerce in the modern world. From swiping credit cards, tapping phones, or using credit card information in digital storefronts, a lot of payment information is moving through digital networks… and potentially insecure technologies. This is why credit card networks created the PCI DSS standard to govern security in the payments industry.
PCI DSS governs these payment technologies, including developing and implementing payment tools at all customer touchpoints. This has led to the PCI DSS Secure Software Life Cycle (SLC) standard, a guideline designed to ensure that security is embedded right from the inception of software development.
The Need for a Secure Software Life Cycle
Regarding payment processing software, the focus is less on user experience or aesthetics and more on security, integrity, and interoperability. (especially for those handling sensitive payment data regularly).
Traditional security practices, though crucial, tend to be added as afterthoughts, tackling problems once they’ve already surfaced. Such a reactive strategy is expensive and can tarnish a company’s image, especially in a data breach.
This is where the Secure Software Life Cycle comes into play. By integrating security measures starting in the software’s design phase, vulnerabilities can be identified and addressed early. Taking a proactive stance ensures the software fulfills its intended functions and stands strong against potential security risks.
For business leaders and tech experts, embracing the Secure SLC goes beyond mere compliance. Ensuring the integrity of payment systems can demonstrate to customers that an organization develops software with an eye on security at all stages of software production.
Delving Deeper into PCI’s Secure Software Framework
The PCI Secure Software Life Cycle Standard is a roadmap for integrating security protocols during development. It’s not merely a checklist; it’s a holistic approach designed specifically for the intricacies of payment software. The essence of this standard can be distilled into two pivotal goals:
- Secure Software Design: The foundation must be robust before diving into the intricacies of coding and deployment. The standard emphasizes that every piece of software, especially those handling delicate payment data, should be conceptualized with security at its core.
- Continuous Vigilance: The digital realm is ever-evolving, and so are its threats. The PCI SLC Standard champions ongoing security, ensuring that as software traverses its life cycle, it remains shielded from emerging vulnerabilities.
Overview of PCI Secure SLC Standard
The PCI SLC Standard provides a guide for ensuring software security within the payment sector, considering the entire development process. Given the ever-changing landscape of software development and its distinct hurdles, the PCI SLC Standard presents an all-encompassing blueprint for payment software. Central to this standard are two key goals:
- Secure Software Design: This emphasizes the importance of building software, particularly those managing delicate payment details, with security at its heart.
- Ongoing Protection: Understanding that security risks are ever-changing, the standard advocates for consistent security practices throughout every stage of the software’s journey, from its creation to its launch.
Secure Software Life Cycle Requirements
Software development is a journey through multiple stages. Many of these stages are revisited multiple times throughout building the software. The PCI Secure SLC Standard seamlessly weaves security into each of these phases.
- Design and Architecture: This is where developers create their blueprint. Potential threats are identified before developers embark on their coding odyssey, and countermeasures are architecturally embedded.
- Building and Code Tests: With secure coding guidelines as their north star, developers ensure the software is operationally sound and fortified against potential breaches.
- Vulnerability Management: Periodic assessments become the norm, scouting for and rectifying vulnerabilities. This proactive stance ensures threats are neutralized before they gain a foothold.
- Deployment, Updates, and Patches: Change is the only constant in the dynamic software world. The standard ensures that every update, whether to enhance features or bolster security, is executed without compromising the software’s integrity.
Validation and Listing Process
Generally, an organization developing a software product that they want to integrate into the SLC Standard will follow a high-level process:
- The organization will engage a Secure SLC Assessor to oversee validation. The organization and assessor will determine the scope, costs, and additional agreements required for the assessment.
- The assessor will audit development processes across planning, development and coding, implementation, vulnerability assessment, deployment, and continual maintenance/patching phases.
- Upon a successful assessment, the assessor completes a Report on Compliance (with all test results) and an Attestation of Compliance, both of which are sent to the PCI SSC for review.
- After review, the organization is listed on the List of Secure SLC Qualified Vendors list on the PCI DSS website.
Roles and Responsibilities
Security is a shared responsibility. While the PCI Secure SLC Standard provides the framework, its successful implementation hinges on collaboration:
- Software Vendors: They play a pivotal role in ensuring compliance, developing software that adheres to the standard, and maintaining its security throughout its life cycle.
- Implementing Organizations: While vendors provide the tools, organizations are responsible for secure implementation and ongoing maintenance. This includes ensuring that developers and planners enforce software updates and timely security measures throughout the process.
Benefits of Adhering to PCI Secure SLC Standard
Beyond compliance, the benefits of adhering to the PCI Secure SLC Standard are manifold:
- Enhanced Security: By embedding security throughout the software life cycle, the risk of vulnerabilities and potential breaches is significantly reduced.
- Trust and Reputation: In a competitive market, trust is invaluable. Organizations that prioritize security are viewed more favorably by customers and partners alike.
- Cost Efficiency: Addressing security issues proactively, rather than reactively, can lead to significant cost savings. Breaches are costly, especially when they are avoidable, and it’s always better ROI to mitigate them before they happen (if possible).
Challenges and Considerations
While the benefits are clear, implementing the PCI Secure SLC Standard is challenging. Many challenges relate to the organization’s corporate culture and preparedness around complex development requirements.
Fundamental challenges will include:
- Changing Mindsets: Shifting from a reactive to a proactive approach to security requires a change in organizational mindset. This involves prioritizing security even when there are more convenient options.
- Training and Expertise: Ensuring compliance requires expertise. Organizations may need to invest in training or bring in external experts to guide the implementation process.
- Balancing Functionality and Security: Striking the right balance between software functionality and security can be challenging. However, the two can complement each other with the right approach, leading to powerful and secure software.
Ensure Your PCI DSS Compliance with Lazarus Alliance
Are you looking for an experienced, trusted, and thorough security partner to help you through PCI DSS or other compliance standards? Then, work with Lazarus Alliance.
What Is Autonomous Malware?
We’re reaching the end of 2025, and looking ahead to 2026, most experts are discussing the latest threats that will shape the year ahead. This year, we’re seeing a new, but not unexpected, shift to autonomous threats driven by state-sponsored actors and AI. With that in mind, a new generation of threats, broadly known as...Continue reading→
What CISA’s Emergency Directive 26-01 Means for Everyone
In mid-October 2025, the CISA issued one of its most urgent orders yet: Emergency Directive 26-01. The directive calls on all Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to immediately mitigate vulnerabilities in devices from F5 Networks following a state-sponsored breach of F5’s systems and access to portions of BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data. The event...Continue reading→
Cybersecurity and Vetting AI-Powered Tools
A recent exploit involving a new AI-focused browser shone a light on a critical problem–namely, that browser security is a constant issue, and AI is just making that threat more pronounced. Attackers discovered a way to use that browser’s memory features to implant hidden instructions inside an AI assistant. Once stored, those instructions triggered unwanted...Continue reading→
Shutdown Security And Cyber Vulnerability
When the federal government shuts down, the public sees closed monuments, unpaid workers, and halted programs. What they do not see is the silent surge of cyberattacks targeting agencies already operating on fumes. During the most recent shutdown, attacks against U.S. government systems spiked by nearly 85%. Cybersecurity failures during government disruptions rarely start with...Continue reading→
Identity and the Shift from Malware
The world of cyber threats is rapidly evolving, and while we can see these changes more generally, it’s always crucial to understand them concretely. As the 2025 CrowdStrike Global Threat Report shows us, the landscape of our industry is changing. We’re digging into this report to discuss a challenging trend: the move of hackers foregoing...Continue reading→
Maintaining Compliance Against Prompt Injection Attacks
The increasing adoption of AI by businesses introduces security risks that current cybersecurity frameworks are not prepared to address. A particularly complex emerging threat is prompt injection attacks. These attacks manipulate the integrity of large language models and other AI systems, potentially compromising security protocols and legal compliance. Organizations adopting AI must have a plan...Continue reading→
Are We Already Talking About CMMC 3.0?
The ink has barely dried on the CMMC final rule, and already the defense contracting community is buzzing with speculation about what comes next. Just when contractors thought they had a moment to catch their breath after years of regulatory limbo, whispers of CMMC 3.0 have begun circulating through the industry. But is this just...Continue reading→
Centralizing Identity-Based Risk
As the traditional network boundary dissolves and remote work becomes standard practice, identities are the major frontier for security. Whether we’re talking about human users, service accounts, or machine identities, these have emerged as both the primary access mechanism and the most targeted attack vector. It has become imperative for providers to centralize identity management...Continue reading→
Deviation and Significant Change Requests in FedRAMP: A Comprehensive Guide
FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. While the program’s rigorous baseline requirements ensure consistent security, the reality is that this consistency calls for a little flexibility. This is where deviation requests and significant change requests come into play. These two...Continue reading→
The Costs of Compliance and Data Breaches
Data is possibly one of the most valuable assets any organization holds. Customer information, employee records, and proprietary business intelligence present challenges because the data flowing through modern enterprises represents both significant opportunities and serious risks. Businesses face a challenging balance: investing in compliance measures to protect sensitive information while also preparing for the real...Continue reading→
Related Posts